Market Overview
U.S. Arc Welding Market comprising of cored arc-welding wire recorded a consumption of 151,000 tons in 2024 and is estimated to reach a volume of 185,932 tons by 2033 with a CAGR of 2.6% during the forecast period.
One of the primary factors driving demand in the U.S. arc welding market from 2023 to 2025 is the ongoing transformation of the automotive manufacturing sector, which encompasses both traditional vehicles and electrified platforms. Historically, the automotive industry has been a major consumer of arc welding technologies, with automotive applications representing approximately 24-25% of the U.S. arc welding equipment market in 2024. This is largely due to the extensive use of welding in body assembly, chassis construction, and component fabrication.
The production of vehicles relies heavily on high-volume and high-repeatability welding processes, such as Metal Inert Gas (MIG)/Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) and Flux-Cored Arc Welding (FCAW). These methods are favored for their ability to produce rapid, consistent welds with strong mechanical integrity across structural components. Arc welding processes are integral to assembly lines, particularly for welding steel frames, exhaust systems, suspension parts, and other metallic subassemblies where both productivity and strength are vital. The automotive sector's dependence on MIG and FCAW underscores their significance as they are often the foundation of automated and semi-automated production cells, especially in high-throughput environments.
Additionally, the growing adoption of lightweight materials, notably Advanced High-Strength Steels (AHSS), has increased the demand for precision welding solutions. The use of lightweight materials and AHSS grades is essential for enhancing fuel efficiency and reducing emissions due to their superior strength-to-weight ratio, which allows for significant reductions in vehicle mass without sacrificing safety. As the automotive industry aims to meet regulatory targets for fuel economy and lifecycle emissions, the use of AHSS and the specialized welding equipment and consumables required to join these steels reliably continues to gain momentum. Even slight increases in AHSS usage within vehicle structures necessitate changes to welding process specifications, as these materials demand tighter heat input control and optimized parameters, prompting manufacturers to invest in advanced arc welding systems equipped with digital controls and automation.
The rise of electrified vehicles, including electric and hybrid models, further enhances this trend. In 2023, annual sales of plug-in electric vehicles in the U.S. surpassed 1.4 million units, accounting for about 9% of total new car sales, indicating a growing yet still emerging segment of the market. While EV adoption may experience fluctuations, the overarching trend toward electrification along with related body and chassis designs that require tailored material mixes ensures a steady demand for arc welding solutions. These combined automotive trends highlight the importance of vehicle manufacturing as a key driver of arc welding demand in the U.S. Sustained production volumes, the incorporation of AHSS and lightweight strategies, and the gradual shift toward electrified platforms all necessitate robust, precise welding technologies that maintain productivity and quality on modern assembly lines.
Cost Structure Analysis
The cost structure of the U.S. arc welding market includes a combination of variable and fixed costs that significantly affect product pricing, profitability, and competitive positioning for both equipment manufacturers and end users. Central to cost allocation are raw materials, which represent a substantial portion of total costs for welding consumables and equipment. For consumables like electrodes and filler wires, materials such as carbon steel, alloy steels, flux materials, and coatings can account for 40–55% of the product cost. This cost is influenced by price volatility in global ferrous metal markets. As a result, producers of consumables are particularly vulnerable to fluctuations in steel prices; a rise in steel prices can lead to sharp increases in the cost of electrodes and wires, which compresses margins unless managed through pricing strategies or long-term supply agreements.
In contrast, equipment manufacturing relies on copper, aluminum, and electronic components (like IGBTs and inverters) to drive material costs, which typically make up 30–45% of the total cost of goods sold (COGS) for arc welding power sources. These components are influenced by global supply chain dynamics and semiconductor shortages, which can increase input costs in some years.
Labor and manufacturing overhead are also significant cost elements, encompassing wages, benefits, and indirect production expenses. Domestic welding equipment manufacturers such as Lincoln Electric and Miller Electric face higher labor costs due to U.S. workforce compensation levels, which can account for 15–25% of total manufacturing costs, compared to their offshore competitors with lower labor costs. Within end-user operations such as vehicle plants, construction sites, and fabrication shops labor can make up a major share of total welding project costs, often representing up to 30–40% of total project expenditures, especially as skilled welders command premium rates alongside training, certification, and safety supervision expenses.
Distribution and logistics further contribute to costs, particularly for consumables that require frequent replenishment. Distributor margins typically range from 10–20%, taking into account transportation, warehousing, and dealer support services. For heavy equipment, transportation costs can significantly affect delivered prices due to their weight and the need for protective packaging. Additionally, marketing, sales, and administrative overheads also play a role in pricing, generally accounting for 10–18% of the total cost structures for manufacturers that prioritize branding and maintaining global sales networks.
Finally, research and development (R&D) and technology development costs represent an important but non-trivial investment. Expenditures on digital welding controls, IoT-enabled monitoring, robotics, and advanced inverter technologies contribute to competitive differentiation and can account for 5–12% of annual revenues for leading equipment manufacturers. While these costs foster innovation, they are amortized over product lifecycles and have an impact on overall margin objectives.
Segmental Analysis- Process
The U.S. arc welding market structure by process reveals a pronounced dominance of high-productivity and automation-friendly technologies, with Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW / MIG) leading the market with a 35% share. This strong positioning reflects GMAW’s versatility, ease of automation, and suitability for high-volume production environments like automotive manufacturing, metal fabrication, and industrial equipment assembly. The process supports continuous wire feeding and high deposition rates, and it is compatible with robotic systems, making it particularly appealing in an environment where manufacturers focus on throughput, cost efficiency, and consistent weld quality. Additionally, its compatibility with mild steel, stainless steel, and aluminum broadens its industrial applications.
Following GMAW, Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW / Stick) holds 26% of the market, highlighting its continued importance despite the industry's shift toward more automated solutions. SMAW remains crucial in construction, maintenance, repair, and field operations due to its portability, low equipment costs, and effectiveness in outdoor or challenging conditions. Infrastructure projects, pipeline repairs, and structural steel erection continue to drive demand for stick welding, especially in areas where environmental factors limit the practicality of gas-shielded processes.
Flux-Cored Arc Welding (FCAW), with an 18% market share, plays a strategic role by balancing productivity and structural strength. It is widely employed in heavy fabrication, shipbuilding, bridge construction, and thick-plate welding applications where deeper penetration and higher deposition rates are necessary. FCAW’s capability to perform well in windy or outdoor conditions, particularly with self-shielded variants, enhances its adoption in structural projects linked to infrastructure expansion and industrial construction.
Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW / TIG) commands a 13% share of the market, reflecting its specialized function in precision welding. TIG welding is known for producing superior weld quality and control, making it essential in industries such as aerospace, high-spec automotive components, food-grade stainless steel fabrication, and critical piping systems. Although it is slower and requires more skill compared to MIG or FCAW, the precision provided by TIG welding ensures steady demand in sectors with stringent quality standards.
At the lower end of the spectrum, Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) captures 6% of the market, primarily focusing on large-scale industrial fabrication projects like pressure vessels, wind towers, and heavy machinery components. Its automated capabilities and ability to deliver deep, clean welds on thick materials make it valuable in specific heavy industrial segments. Plasma Arc Welding (PAW), which accounts for 2%, remains a specialized solution for high-precision or automated applications, often found in aerospace or advanced manufacturing settings.
Overall, this distribution illustrates a market that balances mass-production efficiency with specialized precision requirements. High-volume, automation-compatible processes dominate the landscape, while traditional and niche technologies continue to be relevant where specific environmental, structural, or quality conditions necessitate careful process selection.
Company Analysis
The U.S. arc welding market analysis covers leading industry participants including Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., Miller Electric, Hobart Welding Products, OTC DAIHEN Inc., and ESAB Corporation, along with several other regional and specialized players operating across equipment, consumables, and welding automation segments.
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
1.1 Market Overview
1.2 Key Findings
1.3 Market Size & Forecast (2023–2033)
1.4 Key Growth Drivers
1.5 Competitive Landscape Snapshot
1.6 Analyst Recommendations
2. Market Introduction
2.1 Definition of Arc Welding
2.2 Scope of the Study
2.3 Research Methodology
2.4 Assumptions & Limitations
2.5 Market Segmentation Overview
3. U.S. Arc Welding Market Overview
3.1 Market Size Analysis (USD Million, 2023–2033)
3.2 Volume Analysis (Tons, 2023–2033)
3.3 Historical Market Trends (2018–2022)
3.4 Forecast Analysis (2027–2033)
3.5 Pricing Trend Analysis
3.6 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors
4. Market Dynamics
4.1 Market Drivers
4.1.1 Automotive & EV Production Growth
4.1.2 Infrastructure Investments
4.1.3 Industrial Automation & Robotics Adoption
4.1.4 Reshoring of Manufacturing
4.2 Market Restraints
4.2.1 Skilled Labor Shortage
4.2.2 Raw Material Price Volatility
4.3 Market Opportunities
4.3.1 Advanced High-Strength Steel (AHSS) Welding
4.3.2 Smart & IoT-Enabled Welding Systems
4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.5 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5. Market Segmentation – By Welding Process
5.1 Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW / MIG)
5.2 Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW / Stick)
5.3 Flux-Cored Arc Welding (FCAW)
5.4 Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW / TIG)
5.5 Submerged Arc Welding (SAW)
5.6 Plasma Arc Welding (PAW)
6. Market Segmentation – By Product Type
6.1 Arc Welding Equipment
6.1.1 Manual Welding Equipment
6.1.2 Semi-Automatic Equipment
6.1.3 Automatic & Robotic Systems
6.2 Welding Consumables
6.2.1 Electrodes
6.2.2 Solid Wires
6.2.3 Flux-Cored Wires
6.2.4 Flux & Shielding Gases
7. Market Segmentation – By End-Use Industry
7.1 Automotive & Transportation
7.2 Building & Construction
7.3 Oil & Gas
7.4 Energy & Power Generation
7.5 Aerospace & Defense
7.6 Heavy Machinery & Fabrication
7.7 Shipbuilding
7.8 Others
8. Regional Analysis (Within U.S.)
8.1 Midwest
8.2 South
8.3 West
8.4 Northeast
9. Cost Structure & Pricing Analysis
9.1 Raw Material Cost Breakdown
9.2 Labor & Overhead Costs
9.3 Distribution & Margin Analysis
9.4 Profitability Analysis
10. Competitive Landscape
10.1 Market Share Analysis
10.2 Competitive Benchmarking
10.3 Strategic Developments
10.4 Mergers & Acquisitions
10.5 Product Launches & Innovations
11. Company Profiles
11.1 Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
11.2 Miller Electric
11.3 Hobart Welding Products
11.4 OTC DAIHEN Inc.
11.5 ESAB Corporation
11.6 Other Key & Emerging Players
12. Appendix
12.1 Abbreviations
12.2 Data Sources
12.3 Disclaimer
No of Tables: 250
No of Figures: 200